CAC_GL 77- 2011 Uidelines For Risk Analysis Of Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance
|
ID： |
389123804E814377B0713C14B4978592 |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.28 |
|
页数： |
29 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2011-9-3 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
CAC/GL 77-2011 Page 1 of 29,GUIDELINES FOR RISK ANALYSIS OF FOODBORNE ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE,CAC/GL 77- 2011,Table of Contents,Introduction,Scope,Definitions,General Principles for Foodborne AMR Risk Analysis,Framework for Foodborne AMR Risk Analysis,Preliminary Foodborne AMR Risk Management Activities,Identification of an AMR food safety issue,Development of a foodborne AMR risk profile,Ranking of the food safety issues and setting priorities for risk assessment and management,Establishment of preliminary risk management goals,Establishment of a risk assessment policy,Commission a foodborne AMR risk assessment,Foodborne AMR Risk Assessment,Sources of information,Process of foodborne AMR risk assessment,Hazard identification,Exposure assessment,Hazard characterization,Risk characterization,Foodborne AMR Risk Management,Consideration of the foodborne AMR risk assessment results,Identification of foodborne AMR RMOs,Evaluation of foodborne AMR RMOs,Selection of foodborne AMR RMOs,Implementation of foodborne AMR risk management decision(s),Monitoring and review of foodborne AMR risk management measures,Surveillance of Use of Antimicrobial Agents and AMR Microorganisms and Determinants,Foodborne AMR Risk Communication,Foodborne Risk Communication as a Risk Management Tool,Appendix 1. Elements for Consideration in a Foodborne AMR Risk Profile,Appendix 2. Suggested Elements for Consideration in a Foodborne AMR Risk Assessment,Appendix 3. Examples of Qualitative Foodborne AMR Risk Assessment,CAC/GL 77-2011 Page 2 of 29,LIST OF ACRONYMS USED IN THE DOCUMENT,ALOP Appropriate Level of Protection,AMR Antimicrobial Resistance / Antimicrobial Resistant,CAC/GL Codex Alimentarius Commission / Guidelines,CAC/RCP Codex Alimentarius Commission / Code of Practice,FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,FSO Food Safety Objective,GHP Good Hygiene Practices,GMP Good Manufacturing Practices,GVP Good Veterinary Practices,HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point,MICs Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations,OIE World Organisation for Animal Health,PC Performance Criterion,PO Performance Objective,RMO Risk Management Option,WHO World Health Organization,WTO/SPS World Trade Organization Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary,Measures,CAC/GL 77-2011 Page 3 of 29,INTRODUCTION,1. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR; also used for “antimicrobial resistant” in this document) is a major,global public health concern and a food safety issue. When pathogens become resistant to antimicrobial,agents they can pose a greater human health risk as a result of potential treatment failure, loss of treatment,options and increased likelihood and severity of disease. Problems related to AMR are inherently related to,antimicrobial use in any environment, including human and non-human uses. The use of antimicrobial,agents in food producing animals/crops provides a potentially important risk factor for selection and,dissemination of AMR microorganisms and determinants from animals/food crops to humans via the,consumption of food.,2. In accordance with Codex principles, risk analysis is an essential tool in assessing the risk to human,health from foodborne AMR microorganisms and determining appropriate risk management strategies to,control those risks. Over the past decade, there have been significant developments with respect to the use of,risk analysis approaches in addressing AMR. A series of FAO/OIE/WHO expert consultations on AMR have,led to agreement that foodborne AMR microorganisms are potential microbiological food safety hazards.,Consequently, the need for the development of a structured and coordinated approach for AMR risk analysis,has been emphasized1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . WHO/FAO and OIE guidelines on risk analysis provide broad, structured,approaches to address the potential public health impact of AMR microorganisms of animal/crop origin via,food5 ,6. However, a consolidated framework specific to foodborne AMR risk analysis was considered,necessary, due to the biological complexity of AMR, the multidisciplinary aspects of AMR within the entire,food production to consumption continuum and the need to identify appropriate risk management strategies.,3. More specifically, these guidelines provide a structured risk analysis framework to address the risks to,human health associated with the presence in food and animal feed, including aquaculture, and the,transmission through food and animal feed, of AMR microorganisms or determinants linked to non-human,use of antimicrobial agents.,4. The initial part of the risk analysis framework consists of a group of tasks collectively referred to ……
……